|earli | contact|
Peer review policy
The practice of peer review is applied to ensure that excellent research is published. It is an objective process at the heart of high-quality scholarly publishing and is carried out by all reputable scientific journals. Our referees therefore play a vital role in maintaining the high standards of the Journal of Writing Research and all manuscripts are peer reviewed following the procedure outlined below.
Special issues may have different peer review procedures involving, for example, guest editors or scientific committees. Authors contributing to these projects will receive full details of the peer review process on request.
Initial manuscript evaluation
The Editors first evaluate all manuscripts. Those rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, have poor grammar, or are outside the aims and scope of the journal. Those that meet the minimum criteria are passed on to at least two experts for review.
Type of Peer Review
This journal employs a double blind review process, where the referee remains anonymous throughout the process.
How the referee is selected
Referees are matched to the paper according to their expertise. Our database is constantly being updated. We welcome suggestions for referees from the author though these recommendations may or may not be used.
Referees are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript:
A group of language editors ensures the linguistic and stylistic quality of the manuscript. In the review stage they formulate recommendations to the authors on how to improve the language of their text (minor shortcomings) or formulate advice to contact a native speaker (major shortcomings).
How long does the review process take?
Typically the manuscript will be reviewed within six weeks. If the referees' reports contradict one another or a report is unreasonably delayed, a further expert opinion will be sought. Referees may request more than one revision of a manuscript.
A final decision to accept or reject the manuscript will be sent to the author along with any recommendations made by the referees.
Referees advise the editors, who are responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article.