@article{Van den Bergh_Vandermeulen_Lesterhuis_De Maeyer_Van Steendam_Rijlaarsdam_Van den Bergh_2023, title={How Prior Information from National Assessments can be used when Designing Experimental Studies without a Control Group}, volume={14}, url={https://www.jowr.org/pkp/ojs/index.php/jowr/article/view/1013}, DOI={10.17239/jowr-2023.14.03.05}, abstractNote={<p class="abstract"><span lang="EN-US">National assessments yield a description of the proficiency level in a domain while accounting for differences between tasks. For instance, in writing assessments the level of proficiency is typically evaluated with a variety of topics and multiple tasks. This enables generalizations from specific tasks to a domain. In (quasi-)experimental research, however, writing skills are often evaluated with a single task. Yet, conclusions about the effectiveness of the treatment are formulated on the level of the domain, which is, euphemistically put, quite a stretch. Although conclusions drawn about the effect of the treatment are specific to the task administered, they are often generalized to the domain without any form of reservation. This raises the question whether we can use the results of national assessments about differences between tasks in the analyses of experimental studies. In this paper, we demonstrate how the information of a baseline data set can be used as a kind of control condition in the analysis of an experimental study.</span></p>}, number={3}, journal={Journal of Writing Research}, author={Van den Bergh, Don and Vandermeulen, Nina and Lesterhuis, Marije and De Maeyer, Sven and Van Steendam, Elke and Rijlaarsdam, Gert and Van den Bergh, Huub}, year={2023}, month={Feb.}, pages={447–469} }