Teaching grammar and writing: A randomised controlled trial and implementation process evaluation of Englicious
Keywords:
teaching grammar, teaching writing, national curriculumAbstract
Very few research studies of the teaching of grammar and writing had been carried out with children younger than eight-years-old prior to the research reported in this paper. The research evaluated a new approach to teaching grammar and writing called Englicious. A Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) and Implementation and Process Evaluation (IPE) research design, featuring 1,246 pupils aged six to seven-years-old in 70 primary school classes, was used to evaluate the effectiveness of Englicious for improving children’s writing. The approach was implemented in the context of the programs of study for grammar teaching in England’s national curriculum. The research found that there was no effect of the grammar teaching intervention on pupils’ narrative writing. The effect size for pupils’ sentence generation was sufficient to merit reflections about potential impacts of aspects of the intervention although this outcome also did not reach statistical significance. It is hypothesised that the manipulation of words, phrases and sentences, combined with practice at writing, may have contributed to any positive effect, although this would need to be confirmed in future research. It is concluded that until more research is done to investigate the effectiveness of different approaches to teaching grammar and writing with young children, existing evidence-based approaches are more likely to be effective to help young pupils’ narrative writing. England’s national curriculum specifications for teaching grammar and writing could usefully be reviewed to more closely reflect the evidence base from this field of writing research.
References
Aarts, B. (2011). Oxford Modern English Grammar. Oxford University Press.
Aarts, B. (2019). Teaching English grammar: the Englicious approach. https://www.meits.org/dialogues/article/teaching-english-grammar-the-englicious-approach
Aarts, B., Mehl, S., & Wallis, S. (2016). Language learning at your fingertips. In K. Corrigan & A. Mearns (Eds.), Creating & Digitizing Language Corpora (pp. 211-239). Palgrave.
Aarts, B., & Smith-Dennis, E. (2018). Using corpora for English language teaching and learning. In D. McIntyre & H. Price (Eds.), Applying linguistics: language and the impact agenda. Routledge.
Abbott, R. D., & Berninger, V. (1993). Structural Equation Modeling Of Relationships Among Developmental Skills And Writing Skills In Primary-Grade And Intermediate-Grade Writers. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 85(3), 478-508. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.478
Anders, J., Dockrell, J., Sing, S., Torgerson, C., & Wyse, D. (2021). Grammar and Writing Research Project: Statistical Analysis Plan. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10129724/1/Englicious%20SAP%20v1.0.pdf
Anders, J., Wyse, D., Aarts, B., Dockrell, J., Torgerson, C., Manyukhina, Y., Cushing, I., & Sing, S. (2019). Evaluation protocol: Grammar and Writing research project. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10087427/1/Englicious%20Evaluation%20Protocol%20v1%20FINAL.pdf
Andrews, R., Torgerson, C., Beverton, S., Freeman, A., Locke, T., Low, G., Robinson, A., & Zhu, D. (2004). The effect of grammar teaching (sentence combining) in English on 5 to 16 year olds’ accuracy and quality in written composition. http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/
Arfé, B., Dockrell, J., & Bernardi, B. (2016). The effect of language specific factors on early written composition: the role of spelling, oral language and text generation skills in a shallow orthography. Reading and Writing, 29, 501-527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9617-5
Atkinson, P., & Delamont, S. (2005). Analytic Perspectives. In N. Denzin, K. & Y. Lincoln, S. (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (Third ed., pp. 821-840). Sage.
Berninger, V., Nagy, W., & Beers, S. (2011). Child writers’ construction and reconstruction of single sentences and construction of multi-sentence texts: contributions of syntax and transcription to translation. Reading and Writing, 24, 151-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9262-y
Bland, M. (2015). An Introduction to Medical Statistics. Oxford University Press.
Department for Education (DfE). (2013). The national curriculum in England: Key stages 1 and 2 Framework document. September 2013. Department for Education.
Dockrell, J., Connelly, V., & Arfé, B. (2019). Struggling writers in elementary school: Capturing drivers of performance. Learning and Instruction, 60, 75-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.11.009
Dockrell, J., Marshall, C., & Wyse, D. (2015). Teachers’ reported practices for teaching writing in England. Reading and Writing, 409-434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9605-9
Drijbooms, E., Groen, M., & Verhoeven, L. (2017). How executive functions predict development in syntactic complexity of narrative writing in the upper elementary grades. Reading and Writing, 30(1), 209-231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9670-8
Englicious Survey of English Usage. (2024). Englicious Survey of English Usage. http://www.englicious.org
Fontich, X., Van Rijt, J., & Gauvin, I. (2020). Intro to the Special Issue Research on L1 grammar in schooling: Mediation at the heart of learning grammar. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 20, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2020.20.03.01
Fritz, C. O., Morris, P. E., & Richler, J. J. (2012). Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 2-18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024338
Gerber, A. S., & Green, D. P. (2012). Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation. W. W. Norton & Company.
Graham, S., Kim, Y.-S., Cao, Y., Lee, J. W., Tate, T., Collins, P., Cho, M., Moon, Y., Chung, H., & Olson, C. B. (2023). A meta-analysis of writing treatments for students in grades 6–12. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(7), 1004–1027. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000819
Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., & Harris, K. (2012). A Meta-Analysis of Writing Instruction for Students in the Elementary Grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 879-896.
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007a). A Meta-Analysis of Writing Instruction for Adolescent Students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445-476.
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007b). What We Know, What We Still Need to Know: Teaching Adolescents to Write. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 313-335. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430701530664
Imbens, G. M., & Rubin, D. B. (2015). Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Kawulich, B. (2017). Coding and Analyzing Qualitative Data. In D. Wyse, N. Selwyn, E. Smith, & L. Suter (Eds.), The BERA SAGE Handbook of Educational Research (pp. 769-791). SAGE.
Kim, Y. S. G., & Schatschneider, C. (2017). Expanding the Developmental Models of Writing: A Direct and Indirect Effects Model of Developmental Writing (DIEW). Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(1), 35-50.
Kirkup, C., Reardon, T., & Sainsbury, M. (2006). Progress in English 7: Teacher’s Guide. GL Assessment.
Koster, M., Tribushinina, E., de Jong, P. F., & van den Bergh, H. (2015). Teaching children to write: A meta-analysis of writing intervention research. Journal of Writing Research, 7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2015.07.02.2
Kraft, M. (2020). Interpreting Effect Sizes of Education Interventions. Educational Researcher, 49(4), 241-253.
Myhill, D. (2021). Grammar re-imagined: foregrounding understanding of language choice in writing. English in Education, 55(3), 265-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2021.1885975
Myhill, D., Jones, S., Lines, H., & Watson, A. (2011). Re-thinking grammar: the impact of embedded grammar teaching on students' writing and students' metalinguistic understanding. Research Papers in Education, 27(2), 139-166.
Torgerson, C., Torgerson, D., Mitchell, N., Buckley, H., Ainsworth, H., Heaps, C., & Jefferson, L. (2014). Grammar for Writing: Evaluation Report and Executive Summary. Education Endowment Foundation.
van Rijt, J., & Coppen, P.-A. (2021). Linguistic concepts in L1 grammar education: A systematic literature review. Linguistics and Education, 61, 100890. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2020.100890
Walter, K., Dockrell, J., & Connelly, V. (2021). A sentence combining intervention for struggling writers: response to intervention. Reading and Writing, 34, 1825-1850.
Wasserstein, R. L., Schirm, A. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2019). Moving to a world beyond 'p < 0.05'. The American Statistician, 73(sup1), 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2019.1583913
Wyse, D. (2001). Grammar. For Writing?: A Critical Review of Empirical Evidence. British Journal of Educational Studies, 49 (4), 411-427.
Wyse, D. (2006). Pupils' Word Choices and the Teaching of Grammar. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(1), 31-47.
Wyse, D. (2017). How Writing Works: From the Invention of the Alphabet to the Rise of Social Media. Cambridge University Press.
Wyse, D., Aarts, B., Anders, J., de Gennaro, A., Dockrell, J., Manyukhina, Y., Sing, S., & Torgerson, C. (2022). Grammar and Writing in England’s National Curriculum. A Randomised Controlled Trial and Implementation and Process Evaluation of Englicious. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10144257/
Wyse, D., & Hacking, C. (2024). The Balancing Act: An Evidence-Based Approach to Teaching Phonics, Reading and Writing. Routledge.
Wyse, D., & Torgerson, C. (2017). Experimental trials and ‘what works?’ in education: The case of grammar for writing. British Educational Research Journal, 43(6), 1019-1047. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3315
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dominic Wyse, Bas Aarts, Jake Anders, Alice de Gennaro, Julie Dockrell, Yana Manyukhina, Sue Sing, Carole Torgerson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
