In-class or out-of-class? Unveiling factors influencing EFL learners' dynamic interaction in MALL-based collaborative writing

Authors

  • Lisha Wang Faculty of Arts and Education, The University of Auckland | New Zealand
  • Lirui Li Faculty of Education, Southwest University | China

Keywords:

collaborative writing, Activity theory, In-class writing, Out-of-class writing, mobile learning

Abstract

Mobile assisted language learning (MALL) has facilitated language learning across time and space. Previous studies have found that students show different learning behaviors and interactions in different writing contexts, but few studies have explored how these contexts influenced learners’ interactions in MALL-based collaborative writing. This case study investigated how context-related factors mediated interaction patterns between two groups (n=6) of Chinese secondary EFL learners as they engaged in MALL-based collaborative writing in both in-class and out-of-class contexts. Data were collected from multiple sources, including questionnaires, online writing and discussion records, reflection papers, and semi-structured interviews. Adopting Storch’s (2002) model of “equality” and “mutuality,” this study found that both groups demonstrated a facilitator/collaborative pattern during Task One. However, in Task Two, Group One changed to a collaborative pattern, while Group Two shifted to a cooperative/withdrawn pattern. Drawing upon the expanded activity model, the analysis revealed six factors that shaped students’ interaction dynamics across contexts: goals, roles, emotional engagement, collaborative writing strategies, team management, and technological affordances. These findings deepen our understanding of how writing contexts influence group collaboration and offer both theoretical and empirical insights into how MALL-based collaborative writing can be designed and facilitated in second language (L2) education.

References

Abrams, Z. (2016). Exploring collaboratively written L2 texts among first-year learners of German in Google Docs. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(8), 1259-1270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2016.1270968

Abrams, Z. (2019). Collaborative writing and text quality in Google Docs. Language Learning & Technology, 23(2), 22-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.64152/10125/44681

Aghajani, M., & Adloo, M. (2018). The Effect of Online Cooperative Learning on Students' Writing Skills and Attitudes through Telegram Application. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 433-448. http://dx.doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11330a

Aubrey, S. (2022). Dynamic engagement in second language computer-mediated collaborative writing tasks: Does communication mode matter? Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12(1), 59-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.1.4

Aufa, F., & Storch, N. (2020). Learner interaction in blended collaborative L2 writing activities. In Working collaboratively in second/foreign language learning (pp. 151-176): De Gruyter Mouton. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9781501511318-007

Azkarai, A. (2023). L1 use and patterns of interaction of young EFL learners in a collaborative writing task. Language Teaching for Young Learners, 5(1), 7-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.22010.azk

Chen, W. T., & Zhang, M. X. (2024). Understanding an assessment approach in computer-mediated collaborative writing: Learner perceptions and interactions. Language Awareness, 33(1), 135-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2023.2180513

Cho. (2017). Synchronous web-based collaborative writing: Factors mediating interaction among second-language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 37-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.013

Damon, W., & Phelps, E. (1989). Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education. International Journal of Education Research, 13, 9-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(89)90013-X

Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Ablex.

Duff, P. A. (2013). Identity, agency, and second language acquisition. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 410–426). Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203808184.ch25

Duff, P. A. (2018). Case study research in applied linguistics. Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203827147

Ede, L. S., & Lunsford, A. A. (1992). Singular texts/plural authors: Perspectives on collaborative writing. Southern Illinois University Press.

Engeström, Y. (2015). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139814744

Horton, M., & Rogers, P. (1991). Exploring the impact of face-to-face collaborative technology on group writing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 8(3), 27-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1991.11517928

Horton, M., Rogers, P., Austin, L., & McCormick, M. (1991). Exploring the impact of face-to-face collaborative technology on group writing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 8(3), 27-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1991.11517928

Hsu, H.-C. (2020). The impact of task complexity on patterns of interaction during web-based asynchronous collaborative writing tasks. System, 93, 102328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102328

Hung, D., Lee, S. S., & Lim, K. Y. T. (2012). Authenticity in learning for the twenty-first century: bridging the formal and the informal. Etr&D-Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(6), 1071-1091. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9272-3

Jiang, D. Y., & Zhang, L. J. (2020). Collaborating with 'familiar' strangers in mobile-assisted environments: The effect of socializing activities on learning EFL writing. Computers & Education, 150, 103841. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103841

Jones, A., Kukulska-Hulme, A., Norris, L., Gaved, M., Scanlon, E., Jones, J., & Brasher, A. (2017). Supporting immigrant language learning on smartphones: A field trial. Studies in the Education of Adults-Niace, 49(2), 228-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2018.1463655 doi:10.1080/02660830.2018.1463655

Kost, C. (2011). Investigating writing strategies and revision behavior in collaborative wiki projects. Calico Journal, 28(3), 606-620. http://dx.doi.org/10.11139/cj.28.3.606-620

Kukulska-Hulme. (2009). Will mobile learning change language learning? Recall, 21, 157-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0983009000202

Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2015). Language as a bridge connecting formal and informal language learning through mobile devices. In L.-H. Wong, M. Milrad, & M. Specht (Eds.), Seamless learning in the age of mobile connectivity (pp. 281–294). Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-113-8_14

Kukulska-Hulme, & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. Recall, 20(3), 271-289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0958344008000335

Lai. (2015). Perceiving and traversing in-class and out-of-class learning: accounts from foreign language learners in Hong Kong. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 9(3), 265-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2014.918982

Lai, & Lei, C. (2016). The nature of collaboration and perceived learning in wiki-based collaborative writing. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2586

Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 37–71). M. E. Sharpe. http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-040513024

Li. (2013). Individual novices and collective experts: Collective scaffolding in wild-based small group writing. System, 41(3), 752-769. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.07.021

Li, M. (2018). Computer-mediated collaborative writing in L2 contexts: an analysis of empirical research. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(8), 882-904. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1465981

Li, & Zhu. (2013). Patterns of computer-mediated interaction in small writing groups using wikis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(1), 61-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.631142

Li, & Zhu. (2017). Good or bad collaborative wiki writing: Exploring links between group interactions and writing products. Journal of Second Language Writing, 35, 38-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.01.003

Li, M. (2013). Individual novices and collective experts: Collective scaffolding in wiki-based small group writing. System, 41(3), 752-769. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.07.021

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

Lowry, P. B., Curtis, A., & Lowry, M. R. (2004). Building a taxonomy and nomenclature of collaborative writing to improve interdisciplinary research and practice. Journal of Business Communication, 41(1), 66–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021943603259363

Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education: Revised and expanded from Case study research in education. Jossey-Bass.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman. (1994). Qualitative data analysis : an expanded sourcebook. Sage, 60(100), 105-138.

Montanero, M., Lucero, M., Fernández-Sánchez, M. J., Amante, C., Montanero-Fernández, J., & Lázaro, D. (2026). “Now it’s my turn”. Comparing individual and collaborative writing practices in primary education. Journal of Writing Research. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2026.17.03.05

Oaxaca, G. C. (2025). Examining reading and writing processes in a graduate level multiple text task: A think-aloud study. Journal of Writing Research, 17(2), 247-285. http://dx.doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2025.17.02.03

Or-Kan. (2018). Engaging Undergraduates in Wikis and Regulation Activities to Improve Collaborative Writing Process. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(12), 5087. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i12/5087

Oskoz, A., & Elola, I. (2016). Digital stories: Bringing multimodal texts to the Spanish writing classroom. Recall, 28(3), 326-342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0958344016000094

Peng, C. X. (2024). Beyond accuracy gains: Investigating the impact of individual and collaborative feedback processing on L2 writing development. Assessing Writing, 61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2024.100876

Richards, J. C. (2015). The changing face of language learning: Learning beyond the classroom. Relc Journal, 46(1), 5-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0033688214561621

Sørhaug, J. O. (2026). Prompting for scaffolding: A thematic analysis of K-12 students’ use of educational chatbots for writing support. Journal of Writing Research, 17(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2026.17.03.04

Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00179

Storch, N. (2017). Peer corrective feedback in computer-mediated collaborative writing: Research, theory, applications, implications. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.), Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning: Research, theory, applications, implications (pp. 66–79). Routledge.

Salo, A. E., Routarinne, S., Juvonen, R., & Kaasinen, A. (2023). Participatory roles adopted by elementary students when writing collaboratively in environmental and social studies classrooms. Journal of Writing Research, 15(1), 73-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2023.15.01.04

Stratton, C. R. (1989). Collaborative writing in the workplace. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 32(3), 178-182. doi: 10.1109/47.31626

Su, F., & Zou, D. (2021, July). Shimo-based collaborative argumentative writing: Do grouping patterns matter? In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT). IEEE. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICALT52272.2021.00087

Su, F., Zou, D., & Xie, H. (2022). Integrating Different Group Patterns into Collaborative Argumentative Writing in the Shimo Platform. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09632-8

Trinder, R. (2017). Informal and deliberate learning with new technologies. ELT Journal, 71(4), 401-412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw117

van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7912-5

van Lier, L. (2008). Agency in the classroom. In J. P. Lantolf & M. E. Poehner (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 163–186). Equinox.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4

Wang, L. (2023). MALL‐based collaborative writing in second language classroom: A systematic review. Future in Educational Research, 1(2), 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1002/fer3.18

Watanabe, Y. (2008). Peer-peer interaction between 12 learners of different proficiency levels: Their interactions and reflections. Canadian Modern Language Review-Revue Canadienne Des Langues Vivantes, 64(4), 605-635. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.64.4.605 doi: 10.3138/cmlr.64.4.605

Wawak, S. (2024). Enhancing project quality through effective team management. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 12(2), 50–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.12821/ijispm120203

Yeh, H. C. (2014). Exploring how collaborative dialogues facilitate synchronous collaborative writing, Language Learning & Technology, 18(1), 23-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.64152/10125/44348

Zhang, & Zou, D. (2022). Types, features, and effectiveness of technologies in collaborative writing for second language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 2391-2422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1880441

Zhang, M. (2019). Towards a quantitative model of understanding the dynamics of collaboration in collaborative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45, 16-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.04.001

Zhang, M., & Plonsky, L. (2020). Collaborative writing in face-to-face settings: A substantive and methodological review. Journal of Second Language Writing, 49, 100753. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100753

Zheng, B. B., Warschauer, M., & Farkas, G. (2013). Digital writing and diversity: The effects of school laptop programs on literacy processes and outcomes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(3), 267–299. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/EC.48.3.a

Published

2026-04-06

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Wang, L., & Li, L. (2026). In-class or out-of-class? Unveiling factors influencing EFL learners’ dynamic interaction in MALL-based collaborative writing. Journal of Writing Research. https://www.jowr.org/jowr/article/view/1618

Similar Articles

1-10 of 276

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.