Reflective orientations and genre navigation in dissertation writing: Insights from seven years of doctoral writing retreats
Keywords:
dissertation writing, genre knowledge, metacognition, doctoral education, writing retreatsAbstract
Doctoral dissertation writing is a demanding process requiring writers to navigate complex rhetorical, disciplinary, and institutional expectations. This study examines how doctoral writers perceive and handle these challenges. More than 1000 reflections were collected from 278 participants across seven years of dissertation writing retreats. Through their reflections, writers articulate how they negotiate the dissertation's distinctive parameters, particularly in adapting writing practices to new rhetorical contexts, managing complex research tasks, and developing sustained project timelines. Participants’ reflections also illustrate three distinct approaches to managing writing tasks: strategic problem-solving, affirmative progress recognition, and responsive integration of both approaches. Writers demonstrating a responsive approach, combining practical solutions with positive self-acknowledgment, showed enhanced goal completion compared to those employing strategic approaches alone. This research extends current theoretical frameworks of genre use by considering the relationship between metacognitive problem-solving and positive affect during dissertation drafting. Data suggest that successful genre navigation of dissertations often depends on writers' ability to develop compensatory mechanisms when faced with the tacit or occluded nature of the dissertation expectations. These findings contribute to writing theory by exploring how writers manage complex genres and offer principles for structuring doctoral writing support.
References
Ahmed, S. (2010). Happy objects. In M. Gregg & G. J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 29–51). Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822393047
Autry, M. K., & Carter, M. (2015). Unblocking occluded genres in graduate writing. Composition Forum, 31.
Azevedo, R. (2020). Reflections on the field of metacognition: Issues, challenges, and opportunities. Metacognition and Learning, 15(2), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09231-x
Badenhorst, C. (2021). Research conceptualization in doctoral and master’s research writing. Writing & Pedagogy, 12(2–3), 423–444. https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.19542
Badenhorst, C. (2023). Bridging the unknown: Threshold concepts in academic writing. In L. Buckingham, J. Dong, & F. Jiang (Eds.), Interdisciplinary practices in academia: Writing, teaching and assessment (pp. 147–166). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003263067
Badenhorst, C., & Guerin, C. (2016). Post/Graduate research literacies and writing pedagogies. In C. Badenhorst & C. Guerin (Eds.), Research literacies and writing pedagogies for masters and doctoral writers (pp. 3–28). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004304338
Baillargeon, K. (2020). Dissertation boot camps, writing as a doctoral threshold concept, and the role of extra-disciplinary writing support. Composition Forum, 45.
Barry, K. M., Woods, M., Warnecke, E., Stirling, C., & Martin, A. (2018). Psychological health of doctoral candidates, study-related challenges and perceived performance. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(3), 468–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1425979
Bazerman, C. (1994). Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 67–86). Taylor and Francis.
Bazerman, C. (2009). Genre and cognitive development: Beyond writing to learn. In C. Bazerman, A. Bonini, & D. Figueiredo (Eds.), Genre in a changing world (pp. 283–298). The WAC Clearinghouse; Parlor Press. https://doi.org/10.37514/PER-B.2009.2324.2.14
Bazerman, C. (2018). What does a model model? And for whom? Educational Psychologist, 53(4), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1496022
Bearman, M., Tai, J., Henderson, M., Esterhazy, R., Mahoney, P., & Molloy, E. (2024). Enhancing feedback practices within PhD supervision: A qualitative framework synthesis of the literature. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(5), 634–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2307332
Beaufort, A. (2007). College writing and beyond: A new framework for university writing instruction. Utah State University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt4cgnk0
Bromley, P., & Schonberg, E. (2016). Transfer and dispositions in writing centers: A cross-institutional mixed-methods study. Across the Disciplines, 13(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.37514/ATD-J.2016.13.1.01
Brooks-Gillies, M., Garcia, E. G., Kim, S. H., Manthey, K., & Smith, T. G. (Eds.). (2020). Graduate writing across the disciplines: Identifying, teaching, and supporting. The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.37514/ATD-B.2020.0407
Burford, J. (2017). Conceptualising doctoral writing as an affective-political practice. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 12, 17–32. https://doi.org/10.28945/3689
Burford, J., Amell, B., & Badenhorst, C. (2021a). Conclusion: The unfinished business of re-imagining doctoral writing. In C. Badenhorst, B. Amell, & J. Burford (Eds.), Re-imagining doctoral writing (pp. 267–273). The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.37514/INT-B.2021.1343.3.1
Burford, J., Amell, B., & Badenhorst, C. (2021b). Introduction: The case for re-imagining doctoral writing. In C. Badenhorst, B. Amell, & J. Burford (Eds.), Re-imagining doctoral writing (pp. 3–28). The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.37514/INT-B.2021.1343.1.3
Burgess, A., & Ivanič, R. (2010). Writing and being written: Issues of identity across timescales. Written Communication, 27(2), 228–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088310363447
Caffarella, R. S., & Barnett, B. G. (2000). Teaching doctoral students to become scholarly writers: The importance of giving and receiving critiques. Studies in Higher Education, 25(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/030750700116000
Cahusac De Caux, B. (2021). Doctoral candidates’ academic writing output and strategies: Navigating the challenges of academic writing during a global health crisis. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 16, 291–317. https://doi.org/10.28945/4755
Calle-Arango, L., & Ávila Reyes, N. (2023). Obstacles, facilitators, and needs in doctoral writing: A systematic review. Studies in Continuing Education, 45(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2022.2026315
Campos Oaxaca, G. (2025). Examining reading and writing processes in a graduate level multiple text task: A think-aloud study. Journal of Writing Research, 17(2), 247–285. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2025.17.02.03
Can, G., & Walker, A. (2011). A model for doctoral students’ perceptions and attitudes toward written feedback for academic writing. Research in Higher Education, 52(5), 508–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-010-9204-1
Carter, S. (2011). Doctorate as genre: Supporting thesis writing across campus. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(6), 725–736. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.554388
Carter, S., Guerin, C., & Aitchison, C. (2020). Doctoral writing. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1808-9_2
Carter, S., & Kumar, V. (2017). ‘Ignoring me is part of learning’: Supervisory feedback on doctoral writing. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(1), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1123104
Carter, S., Sun, Q., & Jabeen, F. (2021). Doctoral writing: Learning to write and give feedback across cultures. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 12(3), 371–383. https://doi.org/10.1108/SGPE-07-2020-0054
Casanave, C. P. (2019). Performing expertise in doctoral dissertations: Thoughts on a fundamental dilemma facing doctoral students and their supervisors. Journal of Second Language Writing, 43, 57–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.02.005
Casanave, C. P., & Li, X. M. (2008). Learning the literacy practices of graduate school: Insiders’ reflections on academic enculturation. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.231189
Castelló, M. (2022). Escritura e identidad en contextos de investigación [Writing and identity in research contexts]. Literatura y Lingüística, 46, 29–59. https://doi.org/10.29344/0717621X.46.3157
Castelló, M., González, D., & Iñesta, A. (2010). La regulación de la escritura académica en el doctorado: El impacto de la revisión colaborativa en los textos [Regulating academic writing in doctoral programs: The impact of collaborative review on texts]. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 68(247), 521–537. https://doi.org/10.22550/2174-0909.2473
Castelló, M., Iñesta, A., & Monereo, C. (2009). Towards self-regulated academic writing: An exploratory study with graduate students in a situated learning environment. Electronic Journal of Research in Education Psychology, 7(3), 1107–1130. https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v7i19.1336
Castelló, M., McAlpine, L., Sala-Bubaré, A., Inouye, K., & Skakni, I. (2021). What perspectives underlie ‘researcher identity’? A review of two decades of empirical studies. Higher Education, 81(3), 567–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00557-8
Castelló, M., Pardo, M., Sala-Bubaré, A., & Suñe-Soler, N. (2017). Why do students consider dropping out of doctoral degrees? Institutional and personal factors. Higher Education, 74(6), 1053–1068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0106-9
Castelló, M., & Sala-Bubaré, A. (2023). Research writing as a tool for doctoral students and early career researchers’ development. In The Routledge international handbook of research on writing (2nd edition., pp. 366-378). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429437991-29
Castelló, M., Sala-Bubaré, A., & Pardo, M. (2021). Post-PhD researchers’ trajectories and networking: The mediating role of writing conceptions. Written Communication, 38(4), 479–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883211027949
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd edition). Sage.
Corcelles-Seuba, M., Suñe-Soler, N., Sala-Bubaré, A., & Castelló, M. (2023). Doctoral student perceptions of supervisory and research community support: Their relationships with doctoral conditions and experiences. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 47(4), 481–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2022.2142102
Cotterall, S. (2011). Doctoral students writing: Where’s the pedagogy? Teaching in Higher Education, 16(4), 413–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2011.560381
Cotterall, S. (2013). More than just a brain: Emotions and the doctoral experience. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(2), 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.680017
Devitt, A. J. (2010). Writing genres. Southern Illinois Univ. Press.
Doody, S. (2024). Navigating genres in interdisciplinary life sciences doctoral programs. Technical Communication Quarterly, 33(2), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2023.2229398
Doroholschi, C., & Solli, K. (2025). 'The material you’re working with is yourself’: Student learning experiences with thesis writing. In B. Petrić & M. Castelló (Eds.), The thesis writing journeys of bachelor’s and master’s students (pp. 131–155). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800413993-012
Driscoll, D. L., Paszek, J., Gorzelsky, G., Hayes, C. L., & Jones, E. (2020). Genre knowledge and writing development: Results from the writing transfer project. Written Communication, 37(1), 69–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088319882313
Driscoll, D. L., & Powell, R. (2016). States, traits, and dispositions: The impact of emotion on writing development and writing transfer across college courses and beyond. Composition Forum, 34.
Driscoll, D. L., & Wells, J. (2012). Beyond knowledge and skills: Writing transfer and the role of student dispositions. Composition Forum, 26.
du Boulay, B., Avramides, K., Luckin, R., Martínez-Mirón, E., Mendez, G. R., & Carr, A. (2010). Towards systems that care: A conceptual framework based on motivation, metacognition and affect. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 20, 197–229. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAI-2010-0007
Efklides, A. (2006). Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process? Educational Research Review, 1(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2005.11.001
Elliot, D. L. (2022). A ‘doctoral compass’: Strategic reflection, self-assessment and recalibration for navigating the ‘twin’ doctoral journey. Studies in Higher Education, 47(8), 1652–1665. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.1946033
Evans, T. M., Bira, L., Gastelum, J. B., Weiss, L. T., & Vanderford, N. L. (2018). Evidence for a mental health crisis in graduate education. Nature Biotechnology, 36(3), 282–284. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4089
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
French, A. (2016). Exploring post/graduate academic writing practices, research literacies and writing identities. In C. Badenhorst & C. Guerin (Eds.), Research literacies and writing pedagogies for masters and doctoral writers (pp. 113–131). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004304338_007
Geisler, C., & Swarts, J. (2019). Coding streams of language: Techniques for the systematic coding of text, talk, and other verbal data. The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.37514/PRA-B.2019.0230
Gimenez, J., Paterson, R., & Specht, D. (2024). Doctoral writing through a trajectorial lens: An exploratory study on challenges, strategies and relationships. Higher Education, 87(2), 491–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01019-7
Glorieux, A., Spruyt, B., Minnen, J., & Van Tienoven, T. P. (2024). Calling it quits: A longitudinal study of factors associated with dropout among doctoral students. Studies in Continuing Education, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2024.2314694
Golde, C. M., & Dore, T. M. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of today’s doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. The Pew Charitable Trusts. http://www.phd-survey.org
González-Ocampo, G., & Castelló, M. (2018). Writing in doctoral programs: Examining supervisors’ perspectives. Higher Education, 76(3), 387–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0214-1
Gorzelsky, G., Driscoll, D. L., Paszek, J., Jones, E., & Hayes, C. (2016). Cultivating constructive metacognition: A new taxonomy for writing studies. In C. Anson & J. L. Moore (Eds.), Critical transitions: Writing and the question of transfer (pp. 215–246). The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.37514/PER-B.2016.0797.2.08
Guerin, C. (2016). Connecting the dots: Writing a doctoral thesis by publication. In C. Badenhorst & C. Guerin (Eds.), Research literacies and writing pedagogies for masters and doctoral writers (pp. 30–50). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004304338_003
Halpern, D. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Disposition, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 53(4), 449–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.4.449
Hasgall, A., Saenen, B., Borrell-Damian, L., Van Deynze, F., Seeber, M., & Huisman, J. (2019). Doctoral education in Europe today: Approaches and institutional structures. EUA Council for Doctoral Education.
Hemmings, C. (2005). Invoking affect:Cultural theory and the ontological turn. Cultural Studies, 19(5), 548–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380500365473
Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001
Jahić Jašić, A., & Pavlović, T. (2025). Writing a master’s thesis: Challenges and coping stra tegies. In B. Petrić & M. Castelló (Eds.), The thesis writing journeys of bachelor’s and master’s students (pp. 156–180). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800413993-013
Jensen, T. W., & Nordentoft, H. M. (2022). Academic writing development of master’s thesis pair writers: Negotiating writing identities and strategies. Journal of Academic Writing, 12(1), 50–67. https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v12i1.840
Kurtyka, F. (2015). Settling in to genre: The social action of emotion in shaping genres. Composition Forum, 31.
Lawrence, S., & Zawacki, T. M. (2019). Re/writing the center: Approaches to supporting graduate students in the writing center. Utah State University Press. https://doi.org/10.7330/9781607327516
Leander, K. M., & Ehret, C. (2019). Affect in literacy learning and teaching: Pedagogies, politics, and coming to know. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351256766
Lovitts, B. E., & Nelson, C. (2000). The hidden crisis in graduate education: Attrition from PhD programs. Academe, 86(6), 44. https://doi.org/10.2307/40251951
Lundell, D. B., & Beach, R. (2003). Dissertation writers’ negotiations with competing activity systems. In C. Bazerman & D. R. Russell (Eds.), Writing selves/Writing societies: Research from activity perspectives (pp. 484–515). The WAC Clearinghouse; Mind, Culture, and Activity. https://doi.org/10.37514/PER-B.2003.2317.2.14
Madden, S., Eodice, M., Edwards, K. T., & Lockett, A. (Eds.). (2020). Learning from the lived experiences of graduate student writers. Utah State University Press. https://doi.org/10.7330/9781607329589
Maher, M. (2014). When doctoral students and their supervisors write together. In C. Aitchison & C. Guerin (Eds.), Writing groups for doctoral education and beyond (pp. 82–93). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203498811
Maher, M. A., Feldon, D. F., Timmerman, B. E., & Chao, J. (2014). Faculty perceptions of common challenges encountered by novice doctoral writers. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(4), 699–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.863850
McAlpine, L., Jazvac‐Martek, M., & Hopwood, N. (2009). Doctoral student experience in education: Activities and difficulties influencing identity development. International Journal for Researcher Development, 1(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1108/1759751X201100007
McGrath, L., Negretti, R., & Nicholls, K. (2019). Hidden expectations: Scaffolding subject specialists’ genre knowledge of the assignments they set. Higher Education, 78(5), 835–853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00373-9
Mendoza, L., Lindblom-Ylanne, S., Lehtonen, T., & Hyytinen, H. (2022). Writing a master’s thesis: Associations between the grade, self-efficacy, approaches to writing, and experiences of the thesis as a teaching and learning environment. Journal of Writing Research, 14(2), 257–286. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2022.14.02.04
Micciche, L. R. (2006). The trouble with affect. JAC, 26(1/2), 264–276.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd edition). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638409383686
Moshman, D. (2018). Metacognitive theories revisited. Educational Psychology Review, 30(2), 599–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9413-7
Negretti, R. (2021). Searching for metacognitive generalities: Areas of convergence in learning to write for publication across doctoral students in science and engineering. Written Communication, 38(2), 167–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088320984796
Negretti, R., & McGrath, L. (2018). Scaffolding genre knowledge and metacognition: Insights from an L2 doctoral research writing course. Journal of Second Language Writing, 40, 12–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.12.002
Negretti, R., Sjöberg-Hawke, C., Persson, M., & Cervin-Ellqvist, M. (2023). Thinking outside the box: Senior scientists’ metacognitive strategy knowledge and self-regulation of writing for science communication. Journal of Writing Research, 15(2), 333–361. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2023.15.02.04
Odena, O., & Burgess, H. (2017). How doctoral students and graduates describe facilitating experiences and strategies for their thesis writing learning process: A qualitative approach. Studies in Higher Education, 42(3), 572–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1063598
Palmer, T. S. (2023). Affect and affirmation. In G. J. Seigworth & C. Pedwell (Eds.), The affect theory reader 2: Worldings, tensions, futures. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.5666728
Paré, A. (2011). Speaking of writing: Supervisory feedback and the dissertation. In L. McAlpine & C. Amundsen (Eds.), Doctoral education: Research-based strategies for doctoral students, supervisors and administrators (pp. 59–74). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0507-4_4
Paré, A. (2019). Genre and identity: Individuals, institutions, and ideology. In C. R. Miller & A. J. Devitt (Eds.), Landmark essays on rhetorical genre studies (pp. 185–196). Routledge.
Paré, A., Starke-Meyerring, D., & McAlpine, L. (2009). The dissertation as multi-genre: Many readers, many readings. In C. Bazerman, A. Bonini, & D. Figueiredo (Eds.), Genre in a changing world (pp. 179–194). The WAC Clearinghouse; Parlor Press. https://doi.org/10.37514/PER-B.2009.2324.2.09
Petrić, B., & Castelló, M. (2025). Students’ thesis writing experiences: Conclusions, implications and ways forward. In B. Petrić & M. Castelló (Eds.), The thesis writing journeys of bachelor’s and master’s students (pp. 199–209). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800413993-015
Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667–686. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667
Rigler, K. L., Bowlin, L. K., Sweat, K., Watts, S., & Throne, R. (2017). Agency, socialization, and support: A critical review of doctoral student attrition. 3rd International Conference on Doctoral Education, University of Central Florida.
Roderick, R. (2019). Self-regulation and rhetorical problem solving: How graduate students adapt to an unfamiliar writing project. Written Communication, 36(3), 410–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088319843511
Sala-Bubaré, A., A Peltonen, J., Pyhältö, K., & Castelló, M. (2018). Doctoral candidates’ research writing perceptions: A cross-national study. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 327–345. https://doi.org/10.28945/4103
Sala-Bubaré, A., & Castelló, M. (2017). Exploring the relationship between doctoral students’ experiences and research community positioning. Studies in Continuing Education, 39(1), 16–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2016.1216832
Sala-Bubaré, A., Castelló, M., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2021). Writing processes as situated regulation processes: A context-based approach to doctoral writing. Journal of Writing Research, 13(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2021.13.01.01
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). SAGE Publishing Inc.
Schraw, G. (1994). The effect of metacognitive knowledge on local and global monitoring. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(2), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1013
Shen, L., Zhang, L. J., & Carter, S. (2024). Understanding doctoral students’ needs for thesis discussion writing and supervisory curriculum development: A sociocultural theory perspective. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2024.2354260
Simpson, S. (2012). The problem of graduate-level writing support: Building a cross-campus graduate writing initiative. WPA Journal, 36(1), 95–118.
Simpson, S., Caplan, N. A., Cox, M., & Phillips, T. (Eds.). (2016). Supporting graduate student writers: Research, curriculum, & program design. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.8772400
Skov, S. (2021). PhD by publication or monograph thesis? Supervisors and candidates negotiating the purpose of the thesis when choosing between formats. In C. Badenhorst, B. Amell, & J. Burford (Eds.), Re-imagining doctoral writing (pp. 71–86). The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.37514/INT-B.2021.1343.2.03
Spinuzzi, C. (2003). Tracing genres through organizations: A sociocultural approach to information design. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6875.001.0001
Spinuzzi, C. (2004). Four ways to investigate assemblages of texts: Genre sets, systems, repertoires, and ecologies. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference on Design of Communication, SIGDOC 2004, 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1145/1026533.1026560
Starke-Meyerring, D. (2011). The paradox of writing in doctoral education: Student experiences. In L. McAlpine & C. Amundsen (Eds.), Doctoral education: Research-based strategies for doctoral students, supervisors and administrators (pp. 75–95). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0507-4_5
Starke-Meyerring, D. (2014). Writing groups as critical spaces for engaging normalized institutional cultures of writing in doctoral education. In C. Aitchison & C. Guerin (Eds.), Writing groups for doctoral education and beyond (pp. 65–81). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203498811
Stubb, J., Pyhältö, K., & Lonka, K. (2012). The experienced meaning of working with a PhD thesis. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(4), 439–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.599422
Sundstrom, C. J. (2014). The graduate writing program at the University of Kansas: An inter-disciplinary, rhetorical genre-based approach to developing professional identities. Composition Forum, 29.
Sverdlik, A., C. Hall, N., McAlpine, L., & Hubbard, K. (2018). The PhD experience: A review of the factors influencing doctoral students’ completion, achievement, and well-being. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 361–388. https://doi.org/10.28945/4113
Taczak, K., & Roberston, L. (2017). Metacognition and the reflective writing practitioner: An integrated knowledge approach. In P. Portanova, J. M. Rifenburg, & D. Roen (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on cognition and writing (pp. 211–229). The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.37514/PER-B.2017.0032.2.11
Tardy, C. M., Sommer-Farias, B., & Gevers, J. (2020). Teaching and researching genre knowledge: Toward an enhanced theoretical framework. Written Communication, 37(3), 287–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088320916554
Teng, M. F., Qin, C., & Wang, C. (2022). Validation of metacognitive academic writing strategies and the predictive effects on academic writing performance in a foreign language context. Metacognition and Learning, 17(1), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-021-09278-4
Tremblay-Wragg, É., Vincent, C., Mathieu-C., S., Lison, C., Ponsin, A., & Déri, C. (2022). Writing Retreats Responding to the Needs of Doctoral Candidates Through Engagement with Academic Writing. Qualitative Research in Education, 11(1), 29–57. https://doi.org/10.17583/qre.9195
Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0
Vincent, C., Plante, I., & Tremblay-Wragg, É. (2024). Development and validation of a measure of social well-being during doctoral studies: The sense of scientific community scale. Mesure et Évaluation en Éducation, 45(spécial), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.7202/1108757ar
Vincent, C., Tremblay-Wragg, É., Déri, C. E., & Mathieu-Chartier, S. (2023). A multi-phase mixed-method study defining dissertation writing enjoyment and comparing PhD students writing in the company of others to those writing alone. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(4), 1016–1031. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2022.2120854
Vincent, C., Tremblay-Wragg, É., & Plante, I. (2023). Effects of a participation in a structured writing retreat on doctoral mental health: An experimental and comprehensive study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20206953
Wang, J., Liardét, C., Lum, J., & Riazi, M. (2024). Co-authorship between doctoral students and supervisors: Motivations, reservations, and challenges. Higher Education Research & Development, 43(7), 1615–1631. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2024.2354253
Wardle, E. (2012). Creative repurposing for expansive learning: Considering “problem-exploring” and “answer-getting” dispositions in individuals and fields. Composition Forum, 26.
Weidman, J. C., Twale, D. J., & Stein, E. L. (2001). Socialization of graduate and professional students in higher education: A perilous passage? ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 28(3), 2–138.
Weise, C., & Castelló, M. (2025). Re-constructing the emotional process of writing master’s and bachelor’s theses. In B. Petrić & M. Castelló (Eds.), The thesis writing journeys of bachelor’s and master’s students (pp. 105–130). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800413993-011
Williams, A. D. (2019). “I can’t do cartwheels, so I write”: Students’ writing affect. Composition Studies, 47(2), 68–87.
Yancey, K. B. (Ed.). (2016). A rhetoric of reflection. Utah State University Press. https://doi.org/10.7330/9781607325161
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Kathryn Baillargeon
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
