“Now it’s my turn”. Comparing individual and collaborative writing practices in primary education
Keywords:
Explicit writing instruction, Collaborative writing, Chain writing, Conversational analysis, Primary educationAbstract
This study aimed to analyse the effectiveness of different types of explicit writing instruction (EWI) activities involving individual and collaborative narrative writing in a sample of 93 sixth grade students (ages 11-12). Specifically, the processes and outcomes of three EWI conditions were compared: explicit instruction with individual writing (EWI+IW), with spontaneous collaborative writing (EWI+SCW), and with reciprocal collaborative writing (EWI+RCW). In the SCW condition, the dyads wrote and revised the texts without any guidelines to structure the collaboration. In the RCW condition, the students were asked to alternate the role of writing and revising each text segment with their partner. The quality of 336 texts written individually by the students before and after the training were assessed. In addition, 20 writing events (with a total of 2303 verbal turns) were transcribed and analysed. RCW produced a greater improvement in writing performance than students who engaged in IW practices. Discourse analysis showed that RCW facilitated more symmetrical and balanced collaboration than SCW. The results help to explain discrepancies in the literature. Finally, educational implications are discussed in order to understand how synchronous writing can be effective in upper primary education.
References
Barnes, D. (1976). From Communication to Curriculum. Penguin Books.
Basterrechea, M., & Gallardo, F. (2023). Collaborative writing and patterns of interaction in young learners: The interplay between pair dynamics and pairing method in LRE production. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 20, 49–76. https://doi.org/10.35869/vial.v0i20.4354
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Erlbaum.
Bouwer, R., Van Braak, M., & van der Veen, C, (2024). Dialogic writing in the upper grades of primary school: How to support peer feedback conversations that promote meaningful revisions. Learning and Instruction, 93, Article 101965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101965
Bouwer, R., & Van der Veen, C. (2024). Write, talk and rewrite: The effectiveness of a dialogic writing intervention in upper elementary education. Reading & Writing, 37, 1435–1456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-023-10474-8
Bui, G., & Kong, A. (2019). Metacognitive Instruction for Peer Review Interaction in L2 Writing. Journal of Writing Research, 11(2), 357-392. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2019.11.02.05
Castelló, M., Bañales, G., & Vega, N.A. (2010). Enfoques en la investigación de la regulación de escritura académica: Estado de la cuestión. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 8(3), 1253-1282. https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v8i22.1424
Castelló, M., Kruse, O., Rapp, C., & Sharples, M. (2023). Synchronous and Asynchronous Collaborative Writing. In: O. Kruse et al. (eds.), Digital Writing Technologies in Higher Education (pp. 121-139). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36033-6_8
Carr, N. (2023). Feedback on writing through the lens of activity theory: An exploration of changes to peer-to-peer interactions. Assessing Writing, 56, Article 100720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100720
Cho K. &, MacArthur, C. (2010). Student revision with peer and expert reviewing. Learning and Instruction, 20, 328-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006
Cuetos, F., Ramos, J. L., & Ruano, E. (2002). PROESC: Batería de evaluación de los procesos de escritura. TEA Ediciones.
De Smedt, F., & Van Keer, H. (2018a). Fostering writing in upper primary grades: A study into the distinct and combined impact of explicit instruction and peer assistance. Reading and Writing, 31(2), 325–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9787-4
De Smedt, F., & Van Keer, H. (2018b). An analytic description of an instructional writing program combining explicit writing instruction and peer-assisted writing. Journal of Writing Research, 10(2), 225–277. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2018.10.02.04
De Smedt, F., Graham, S., & Van Keer, H. (2020). “It takes two”: The added value of structured peer-assisted writing in explicit writing instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, Article 101835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101835
Ede, L., & Lunsford, A. (1990). Singular texts/plural authors: perspectives on collaborative writing. Southern Illinois University Press.
Falardeau, E., Guay, F., Dubois, P., & Pelletier, D. (2024). Effects of teacher-implemented explicit writing instruction on the writing self-efficacy and writing performance of 5th grade students. Journal of Writing Research, 16(1), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2024.16.01.01
Ferguson‐Patrick, K. (2007) Writers develop skills through collaboration: an action research approach. Educational Action Research, 15(2), 159-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790701314585
Fernández, M. J., Montanero, M., & Lucero, M. (2019). The assessment of narrative competence during compulsory schooling. Revista de Educación, 383, 85-112. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2015-372-315
Fidalgo, R., Torrance, M., & Robledo, P. (2011). Comparación de dos programas de instrucción estratégica y autorregulada para la mejora de la composición escrita. Psicothema, 23(4),672–680.
Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 304–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007
Graham, S., Cao, Y., Kim, Y.-S. G., Lee, J., Tate, T., Collins, P., Cho, M., Moon, Y., Chung, H. Q., & Olson, C. B. (2025). Effective writing instruction for students in grades 6 to 12: A best evidence meta-analysis. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 38(4), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10539-2
Graham, S., Gillespie, A., & McKeown, D. (2013). Writing: Importance, development, and instruction. Reading and Writing, 26(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9395-2
Graham S., & Harris K. R. (2016). Evidence-based practice and writing instruction. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd ed., pp. 211-226). Guilford.
Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., & Harris, K. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 879–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029185
Graham, S., Kim, Y., Cao, Y., Lee, W., Tate, T., Collins, T., Cho, M., Moon, Y., Chung, H., & Olson, C. (2023). A meta-analysis of writing treatments for students in Grades 6 to 12. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115, 1004-1027. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1037/ edu00 00819
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A Meta-Analysis of Writing Instruction for Adolescent Students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445-476. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445
Harris, K.R., Graham, S., & Mason, L.H. (2006). Improving the Writing, Knowledge, and Motivation of Struggling Young Writers: Effects of Self-Regulated Strategy Development With and Without Peer Support. American Educational Research Journal, 43(2), 295–340. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312043002295
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Heinimäki, O.P., Volet, S., Jones, C., Laakkonen, E., & Vauras, M. (2021). Student participatory role profiles in collaborative science learning: Relation of within-group configurations of role profiles and achievement. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 30 (part A), Article 100539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100539
Hennessy, S., Rojas-Drummond, S., Higham, R., Márquez, A. M., Maine, F., Ríos, R. M., García-Carrión, R., Torreblanca, O., & Barrera, M. J. (2016). Developing a coding scheme for analysing classroom dialogue across educational contexts. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 9, 16-44. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.1201
Herder, A., Berenst, J., De Glopper, K., & Koole, T. (2018). Nature and function of proposals in collaborative writing of primary school students. Linguistics and Education, 46, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2018.04.005
Herder, A., Berenst, J., de Glopper, K., & Koole, T. (2020). Sharing knowledge with peers: Epistemic displays in collaborative writing of primary school children. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 24, Article 100378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100378
Hoogeveen, M., & Van Gelderen, A. (2016). Writing with peer response using different types of genre knowledge: Effects on linguistic features and revisions of sixth-grade writers. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1190913
Jefferson, G. (1984). Transcript Notation. In: J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. 9-26). Cambridge University Press.
Kellogg, R. T. (1994). The psychology of writing. Oxford University Press.
Koster, M., Tribushinina, E., de Jong, P. F., & van den Bergh, H. (2015). Teaching children to write: A meta-analysis of writing intervention research. Journal of Writing Research, 7(2), 249–274. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-201572.2
Lowry, P. B., Curtis, A., & Lowry, M. R. (2004). Building a taxonomy and nomenclature of collaborative writing to improve interdisciplinary research and practice. Journal of Business Communication, 41(1), 66-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943603259363
Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002
Madeira, M. L. (2015). Escritura colaborativa de narraciones en la Educación Primaria: recursos de apoyoa la planificación y a la revisión entre pares [Doctoral thesis]. Universidad de Extremadura. https://dehesa.unex.es/handle/10662/2859
Maine, F., & Cermáková, A. (2021). Using linguistic ethnography as a tool to analyse dialogic teaching in upper primary classrooms. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 29, Article 100500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100500
McKeown, D., FitzPatrick, E., Brown, M., Brindle, M., Owens, J., & Hendrick, R. (2019). Urban teachers’ implementation of SRSD for persuasive writing following practice-based professional development: positive effects mediated by compromised fidelity. Reading and Writing, 32(6), 1483–1506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9864-3
Mayo, A. B., Fernández-Sánchez, M. J., Montanero, M., & Martín, D. (2022) Co-evaluation of Expositive Texts in Primary Education: Rubric vs Comments. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 17 (27). https://doi.org/10.7275/9hgz-sz82
Meneses, A., Montenegro, M., Acevedo, D., Figueroa, J., & Hugo, E. (2023). Cross-disciplinary language changes in 4th graders as a predictor of the quality of written scientific explanation. Journal of Writing Research, 15(1), 105-132. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2023.15.01.05
Mercer, N. (1995). The Guided Construction of Knowledge: talk amongst teachers and learners. Multilingual Matters.
Montanero, M., Lucero, M., & Fernández-Sánchez, M. J. (2014). Iterative co-evaluation with a rubric of narrative texts in Primary Education. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 37(1), 184-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2014.881653
Montanero, M., Lucero, M., & Fernández-Sánchez, M. J., Amante, C., & Lázaro. D. (2025). Dialogic interaction between young writers: spontaneous vs. structured collaboration, Classroom Discourse. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2024.2446433
Montanero, M., & Madeira, M. L. (2019). Collaborative chain writing: Effects on the narrative competence of primary school students. Infancia y aprendizaje, 42(4), 915-931. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2019.1650464
Montanero, M., & Tabares, C. (2020). El aprendizaje cooperativo en la Educación Primaria: un estudio sobre el pensamiento del profesorado y la práctica docente en Extremadura. Profesorado, 24(3), 357-379. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v24i3.8200
Palermo, C. & Thomson, M. M. (2018). Teacher implementation of Self-Regulated Strategy Development with an automated writing evaluation system: Effects on the argumentative writing performance of middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 54, 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.07.002
Rojas-Drummond, S., Littleton, K., Hernandez, F., & Zuniga, M. (2010). Dialogical interactions among peers in collaborative writing contexts. In K. Littleton, C. Howe (Eds.), Educational Dialogues, Understanding and Promoting Productive Interaction (pp. 128–148). Routledge.
Rojas-Drummond, S., Maine, F., Alarcón, M., Trigo, A. L., Barrera, M. J., Mazón, N., Vélez, M., & Hofmann, R. (2017). Dialogic literacy: Talking, reading and writing among primary school children. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 12, 45–62. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.6504
Rojas-Drummond, S., Barrera, M. J., Hernández, I., Alarcón, M., Hernández, J., & Márquez, A. M. (2020). Exploring the ‘black box’: What happens in a dialogic classroom? Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 43(1), 47-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03652043
Routarinne, S., Juvonen, R., & Pentikäinen, J. (2023). Developing writing across and in school subjects: Introduction to special issue. Journal of Writing Research, 15(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2023.15.01.01
Salo, A.-E., Routarinne, S., Juvonen, R., & Kaasinen, A. (2023). Participatory roles adopted by elementary students when writing collaboratively in environmental and social studies classrooms. Journal of Writing Research, 15(1), 73-103. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2023.15.01.04
Svenlin, M., & Sørhaug, J. O. (2022). Collaborative Writing in L1 School Contexts: A Scoping Review. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2022.2115128
Thompson, I., & Wittek, A. L. (2016). Writing as a mediational tool for learning in the collaborative composition of texts. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 11, 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.05.004
Topping, K., Nixon, J., Sutherland, J., & Yarrow, F. (2000). Paired writing: A framework for effective collaboration. Reading, 34(2), 79-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9345.00139
Topping, K. (2005). Trends in Peer Learning. Educational Psychology, 25(6), 631–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500345172
Topping, K. (2010). Methodological quandaries in studying process and outcomes in peer assessment. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 339-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.003
Van Steendam, E. (2016). Editorial: Forms of collaboration in writing. Journal of Writing Research, 8(2), 183-204. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2016.08.02.01
Van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & Van Merrienboer, J. (2010). Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction, 20, 270-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004
Yarrow, F., & Topping, K. (2001). Collaborative writing: The effects of metacognitive prompting and structured peer interaction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 261 – 282. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709901158514
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Manuel Montanero, Manuel Lucero, María Jesús Fernández-Sánchez, Cristina Amante, Jesús Montanero-Fernández, Daniel Lázaro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
