Which modality results in superior recall for students: Handwriting, typing, or drawing?


  • Lindsay Richardson Carleton University
  • Guy Lacroix Carleton University


drawing, handwriting, typing, notetaking, education


One of the most common interests among cognitive psychologists is establishing ways to enhance human learning. An additional layer of complexity has been brought on by the rapid evolution of technology. Specifically, examining if the mechanisms involved in typing differ from those involved in handwriting. The literature concerning the implications of encoding modality on memory have been inconclusive. This present research examined whether encoding modality resulted in performance differences for word recall. Wammes et al.’s (2016) drawing versus handwriting methodology was utilized with the addition of a typing condition. The results replicated the drawing effect, whereby drawn words were better recalled than handwritten ones. Overall, the evidence did not suggest that the mechanisms involved in handwriting led to better free recall than those involved in typing. However, if the pen is indeed mightier than the keyboard (Mueller & Oppenheimer, 2014), then the effect is not explained by visual attention or sensorimotor action differences between modalities. Implications for education are discussed.


Balota, D.A., Yap, M.J., Cortese, M.J., Hutchison, K.A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J.H., Nelson, D.L., Simpson, G.B., & Treiman, R. (2007). The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445-459.



Blankenship, M. W. (2017). Comparing note taking and test performance in methods and modes of note taking conditions (Order No. AAI10141351). Available from PsycINFO. (1905877115; 2017-01051-270). Retrieved from http://proxy.library.carleton.ca/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.proxy.library.carleton.ca/docview/1905877115?accountid=9894

Bui, D. C., Myerson, J., & Hale, S. (2013). Notetaking with computers: Exploring alternative strategies for improved recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 299-309. doi:http://dx.doi.org.proxy.library.carleton.ca/10.1037/a0030367


Craik, F. I., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671-684. doi:http://dx.doi.org.proxy.library.carleton.ca/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X


Dunkel, P., & Davy, S. (1989). The heuristic of lecture notetaking: Perceptions of American & international students regarding the value & practice of notetaking. English for Specific Purposes, 8, 33-50. doi:10.1016/0889-4906(89)90005-7


Fried, C. B. (2008). In-class laptop use and its effects on student learning. Computers & Education, 50, 906-914.


Gaudreau, P., Miranda, D., & Gareau, A. (2014). Canadian university students in wireless classrooms: What do they do on their laptops and does it really matter? Computers & Education, 70, 245-255.


Gouvier, W. Drew , Barker, . Alyse A. and Musso, . Mandi Wilkes (2014, October 28). ecological validity. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/science/ecological-validity

Grace-Martin, M., & Gay, G. (2001). Web browsing, mobile computing and academic performance. Educational Technology & Society, 4, 95-107.

Hartley, J. (1983). Notetaking research: Resetting the scoreboard. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society. 36(1), 12-14

Hunt, R. R. (1995). The subtlety of distinctiveness: What von restorff really did. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2(1), 105-112. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03214414



Kay, R., & Lauricella, S. (2011). Exploring the benefits and challenges of using laptop computers in higher education classrooms: A formative analysis. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 37(1). Retrieved from http://www.cjlt.ca/ index.php/cjlt/article/view/565/299


Kiewra, K. A. (1989). A review of notetaking: The encoding-storage paradigm and beyond. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 147-172.


Kodaira, Y. (2017). An investigation of cognitive processes associated with notetaking and notes-review (Order No. 10275166). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global: Health & Medicine; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global: Social Sciences. (1896530052). Retrieved from http://proxy.library.carleton.ca/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.proxy.library.carleton.ca/docview/1896530052?accountid=9894

Kraushaar, J. M., & Novak, D. C. (2010). Examining the affects of student multitasking with laptops during the lecture. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21, 241-251.

Mangen, Anda, Oxborough, & Brønnick (2015). Handwriting versus Keyboard Writing: Effect on Word Recall. Journal of Writing Research, 7, 227-247.


Manzi, A., Martinez, S., & Durmysheva, Y. (2017). Cognitive correlates of lecture notetaking: Handwriting speed and attention. North American Journal of Psychology, 19(1), 195-217. Retrieved from http://proxy.library.carleton.ca/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.proxy.library.carleton.ca/docview/1878904220?accountid=9894

Morehead, K., Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Blasiman, R., & Hollis, R. B. (2019). Notetaking habits of 21st Century college students: implications for student learning, memory, and achievement, Memory. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2019.1569694



Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop notetaking. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1159-1168. doi:http://dx.doi.org.proxy.library.carleton.ca/10.1177/0956797614524581



Psychology Software Tools, Inc. [E-Prime 3.0]. (2016). Retrieved from https://support.pstnet.com/.

Putnam, A. L., Sungkhasettee, V. W., & Roediger, Henry L., I.,II. (2016). Optimizing learning in college. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(5), 652-660. doi:http://dx.doi.org.proxy.library.carleton.ca/10.1177/1745691616645770



Restorff, H. V. (1933). Ueber die Wirkung von Bereichsbildungen im Spurenfeld. Analyse von Vorgängen im Spurenfeld. I. Von W. Köhler und H. v. Restorff [On the effect of field formations in the trace field. Analysis of processes in the trace field. I. By W. Kohler and H. v. Restorff]. Psychologische Forschung, 18, 299-342. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02409636


Skolnick, R., & Puzo, M. (2008). Utilization of laptop computers in the school of business classroom. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 12, 1-10.

Sovern, J. (2013). Law student laptop use during class for non- class purposes: Temptation v. incentives. University of Louisville Law Review, 51, 483-517.

Tutt, P. (2021, April 9). How - and Why - to Introduce Visual Note-Taking to Your Students. Edutopia. https://www.edutopia.org/article/how-and-why-introduce-visual-note-taking-your-students

Urry, H. L., Crittle, C. S., Floerke, V. A., Leonard, M. Z., Perry,Clinton S., I.,II, Akdilek, N., . . . Zarrow, J. E. (2021). Don't ditch the laptop just yet: A direct replication of Mueller and Oppenheimer's (2014) study 1 plus mini meta-analyses across similar studies. Psychological Science, 32(3), 326-339. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797620965541



Wammes, J. D., Jonker, T. A., & Fernandes, M. A. (2019). Drawing improves memory: The importance of multimodal encoding context. Cognition, 191(2019), 1-9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.024



Wammes, J. D., Meade, M. E., & Fernandes, M. A. (2016). The drawing effect: Evidence for reliable and robust memory benefits in free recall. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(9), 1752-1776. doi:http://dx.doi.org.proxy.library.carleton.ca/10.1080/17470218.2015.1094494



Williams, R. L., & Eggert, A. C. (2002). Notetaking in college classes: Student patterns and instructional strategies. The Journal of General Education, 51, 173-199. doi:10.1353/jge.2003.0006


Yamamoto, K. (2007). Banning laptops in the classroom: Is it worth the hassle? Journal of Legal Education, 57, 477-520.



How to Cite

Richardson, L., & Lacroix, G. (2023). Which modality results in superior recall for students: Handwriting, typing, or drawing?. Journal of Writing Research. Retrieved from https://www.jowr.org/pkp/ojs/index.php/jowr/article/view/963