Conditions for writing to learn

Authors

  • David Galbraith

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2015.07.01.09

Keywords:

writing to learn, cognitive processes, writing interventions, dual process model

Abstract

This paper is a response to an invitation from the editors of the special issue to comment on the ingredients of effective writing to learn interventions as reflected in the contributions to the special issue. The six papers in the issue vary widely in approach and underlying theoretical frameworks but share the broad common theme of writing to learn. Within this, they vary along three main dimensions: (i) how learning is defined and assessed, and in particular whether they assess effects of the writing intervention on content knowledge; (ii) related to this, whether they are primarily focussed on discipline specific skills or on more general effects of writing; and (iii) whether they are designed to carry out a controlled evaluation of the writing intervention or rather are concerned with describing the design and purpose of a specific intervention. In what follows, I will first consider the general characteristics of the papers in relation to these three dimensions. I will then reflect on the findings of the individual papers, and then conclude by relating the papers to my personal understanding of writing to learn in terms of a dual-process model of writing.

Published

2015-06-15

How to Cite

Galbraith, D. (2015). Conditions for writing to learn. Journal of Writing Research, 7(1), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2015.07.01.09

Issue

Section

Commentary